Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Crit Care Med ; 51(5): 619-631, 2023 05 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2258725

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence and outcomes associated with hemorrhage, disseminated intravascular coagulopathy, and thrombosis (HECTOR) complications in ICU patients with COVID-19. DESIGN: Prospective, observational study. SETTING: Two hundred twenty-nine ICUs across 32 countries. PATIENTS: Adult patients (≥ 16 yr) admitted to participating ICUs for severe COVID-19 from January 1, 2020, to December 31, 2021. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: HECTOR complications occurred in 1,732 of 11,969 study eligible patients (14%). Acute thrombosis occurred in 1,249 patients (10%), including 712 (57%) with pulmonary embolism, 413 (33%) with myocardial ischemia, 93 (7.4%) with deep vein thrombosis, and 49 (3.9%) with ischemic strokes. Hemorrhagic complications were reported in 579 patients (4.8%), including 276 (48%) with gastrointestinal hemorrhage, 83 (14%) with hemorrhagic stroke, 77 (13%) with pulmonary hemorrhage, and 68 (12%) with hemorrhage associated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) cannula site. Disseminated intravascular coagulation occurred in 11 patients (0.09%). Univariate analysis showed that diabetes, cardiac and kidney diseases, and ECMO use were risk factors for HECTOR. Among survivors, ICU stay was longer (median days 19 vs 12; p < 0.001) for patients with versus without HECTOR, but the hazard of ICU mortality was similar (hazard ratio [HR] 1.01; 95% CI 0.92-1.12; p = 0.784) overall, although this hazard was identified when non-ECMO patients were considered (HR 1.13; 95% CI 1.02-1.25; p = 0.015). Hemorrhagic complications were associated with an increased hazard of ICU mortality compared to patients without HECTOR complications (HR 1.26; 95% CI 1.09-1.45; p = 0.002), whereas thrombosis complications were associated with reduced hazard (HR 0.88; 95% CI 0.79-0.99, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: HECTOR events are frequent complications of severe COVID-19 in ICU patients. Patients receiving ECMO are at particular risk of hemorrhagic complications. Hemorrhagic, but not thrombotic complications, are associated with increased ICU mortality.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Trombosis , Adulto , Humanos , COVID-19/complicaciones , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/terapia , Estudios Prospectivos , Enfermedad Crítica , Trombosis/epidemiología , Trombosis/etiología , Cuidados Críticos , Hemorragia/epidemiología , Hemorragia/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos
2.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg ; 2022 Mar 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1796408

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the influence of venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) on outcomes of mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19 during the first 120 days after hospital discharge. METHODS: Five academic centers conducted a retrospective analysis of mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19 admitted during March through May 2020. Survivors had access to a multidisciplinary postintensive care recovery clinic. Physical, psychological, and cognitive deficits were measured using validated instruments and compared based on ECMO status. RESULTS: Two hundred sixty two mechanically ventilated patients were compared with 46 patients cannulated for venovenous ECMO. Patients receiving ECMO were younger and traveled farther but there was no significant difference in gender, race, or body mass index. ECMO patients were mechanically ventilated for longer durations (median, 26 days [interquartile range, 19.5-41 days] vs 13 days [interquartile range, 7-20 days]) and were more likely to receive inhaled pulmonary vasodilators, neuromuscular blockade, investigational COVID-19 therapies, blood transfusions, and inotropes. Patients receiving ECMO experienced greater bleeding and clotting events (P < .01). However, survival at discharge was similar (69.6% vs 70.6%). Of the 217 survivors, 65.0% had documented follow-up within 120 days. Overall, 95.5% were residing at home, 25.7% had returned to work or usual activity, and 23.1% were still using supplemental oxygen; these rates did not differ significantly based on ECMO status. Rates of physical, psychological, and cognitive deficits were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that COVID-19 survivors experience significant physical, psychological, and cognitive deficits following intensive care unit admission. Despite a more complex critical illness course, longer average duration of mechanical ventilation, and longer average length of stay, patients treated with venovenous ECMO had similar survival at discharge and outcomes within 120 days of discharge.

3.
Ann Thorac Surg ; 110(2): 697-700, 2020 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-701360

RESUMEN

In the setting of the current novel coronavirus pandemic, this document has been generated to provide guiding statements for the adult cardiac surgeon to consider in a rapidly evolving national landscape. Acknowledging the risk for a potentially prolonged need for cardiac surgery procedure deferral, we have created this proposed template for physicians and interdisciplinary teams to consider in protecting their patients, institution, and their highly specialized cardiac surgery team. In addition, recommendations on the transition from traditional in-person patient assessments and outpatient follow-up are provided. Lastly, we advocate that cardiac surgeons must continue to serve as leaders, experts, and relevant members of our medical community, shifting our role as necessary in this time of need.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Cirugía Torácica/organización & administración , Triaje , Adulto , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos , Infecciones por Coronavirus/prevención & control , Recursos en Salud/provisión & distribución , Humanos , Exposición Profesional/prevención & control , Pandemias/prevención & control , Neumonía Viral/prevención & control , SARS-CoV-2
4.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg ; 160(2): 447-451, 2020 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-661781

RESUMEN

The COVID-19 pandemic necessitates aggressive infection mitigation strategies to reduce the risk to patients and healthcare providers. This document is intended to provide a framework for the adult cardiac surgeon to consider in this rapidly changing environment. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative detailed protective measures are outlined. These are guidance recommendations during a pandemic surge to be used for all patients while local COVID-19 disease burden remains elevated.


Asunto(s)
Betacoronavirus/patogenicidad , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/normas , Infecciones por Coronavirus/prevención & control , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Cardiopatías/cirugía , Control de Infecciones/normas , Transmisión de Enfermedad Infecciosa de Paciente a Profesional/prevención & control , Transmisión de Enfermedad Infecciosa de Profesional a Paciente/prevención & control , Quirófanos/normas , Pandemias/prevención & control , Neumonía Viral/prevención & control , Sala de Recuperación/normas , COVID-19 , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/efectos adversos , Consenso , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/transmisión , Infecciones por Coronavirus/virología , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Infección Hospitalaria/transmisión , Infección Hospitalaria/virología , Cardiopatías/epidemiología , Humanos , Salud Laboral/normas , Seguridad del Paciente/normas , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Neumonía Viral/transmisión , Neumonía Viral/virología , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , SARS-CoV-2 , Virulencia
5.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg ; 160(2): 452-455, 2020 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-72075

RESUMEN

In the setting of the current novel coronavirus pandemic, this document has been generated to provide guiding statements for the adult cardiac surgeon to consider in a rapidly evolving national landscape. Acknowledging the risk for a potentially prolonged need for cardiac surgery procedure deferral, we have created this proposed template for physicians and interdisciplinary teams to consider in protecting their patients, institution, and their highly specialized cardiac surgery team. In addition, recommendations on the transition from traditional in-person patient assessments and outpatient follow-up are provided. Lastly, we advocate that cardiac surgeons must continue to serve as leaders, experts, and relevant members of our medical community, shifting our role as necessary in this time of need.


Asunto(s)
Betacoronavirus/patogenicidad , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/normas , Infecciones por Coronavirus/prevención & control , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Cardiopatías/cirugía , Control de Infecciones/normas , Transmisión de Enfermedad Infecciosa de Paciente a Profesional/prevención & control , Transmisión de Enfermedad Infecciosa de Profesional a Paciente/prevención & control , Pandemias/prevención & control , Neumonía Viral/prevención & control , Triaje/normas , COVID-19 , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/efectos adversos , Consenso , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/transmisión , Infecciones por Coronavirus/virología , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Infección Hospitalaria/transmisión , Infección Hospitalaria/virología , Cardiopatías/epidemiología , Humanos , Salud Laboral/normas , Seguridad del Paciente/normas , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Neumonía Viral/transmisión , Neumonía Viral/virología , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , SARS-CoV-2 , Virulencia
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA